Is First Solar Inc., the Parent of Antelope Valley’s Solar projects: Willow Springs, AVSolar Rancho One and EdisonMission Energy in financial trouble?

According to Investing Daily and other news sources First Solar lowered its sales forecast. First Solar said it now expects sales of $2.8 billion to $2.9 billion on the year, down from its previous estimate of $3.0 billion to $3.3 billion. The company also said it will lay off about 100 workers, or roughly 1.5% of its workforce.
There stock was at a high in 2008 at 300 a share to now under $40 a share. Other stock watchers have indicated that the Chinese are making less expensive solar panel chips, so First Solar intends to get out of the roof panel business part of solar. The Chinese production is highly automated and the factories are subsidized.
Other solar companies have gone bankrupt such as Fremont, Ca. Solyndra and Massachusetts based Evergreen Solar.
First Solar’s press release, Mike Ahearn, the company’s chairman and interim CEO, alluded to subsidy cuts when he said the company was recalibrating its business “to focus on building and serving sustainable markets rather than pursuing subsidized markets.”
First Solar is not in the same situation as Solyndra as Solyndra was backed by US Government loans. Evergreen Solar situation is also different. Evergreen was selling primarily solar panels. Solar panel prices dropped worldwide and Evergreen was losing money on every panel it made. That is a reason why First Solar is getting out of the panel business.
We will be keeping tabs on First Solar’s progress and it has become a pivotal part of the landscape in Antelope Valley.

The Train, the train is Coming to the Central Valley by Fall 2013

The state has secured $3.9 billion in federal money, and California taxpayers have approved bonds for the rest. Construction is actually set to start by late next year on the first leg between Bakersfield and Fresno at an estimated cost of $5.8 billion. If construction begins then the project will likely be the largest in the Union with California and the Federal government on the hook for billions of dollars in future costs.

It is not likely to go smoothly though. The estimated costs have essentially doubled with right of way issues as the train will move into urban areas. Also the state and federal governments are currently running deficits and the private sector is not all in, so finding future funds could get murky. It also looks like California voters are a little flakey. Recent polls showing voters would not have voted for the train if the vote was today.

Democrats have indicated that clogged highways are smog choking their districts, so a train system is necessary. Republicans indicate that Amtrak is not in full use, so a high priced fast train is not a solution. A big problem maybe in Palo Alto, Ca. where democrats have riled against new rail lines passing through neighborhoods.

There is indication that at least another $20 billion will be needed, so the alternative to the lack of funds will be that if the speed train fails then Amtrak will run along the new tracks. The initial stage is the Fresno to Bakersfield route and the next stage would link the San Joaquin Valley to San Jose or Bakersfield to San Fernando (Los Angeles County

The State will need funds past the Fresno to Bakersfield plan though, but despite the backlash the Cal-High-Speed Rail Authority is moving forward. They have the initial money and they plan on laying the tracks. The current administration is behind the effort, and the Rail Authority feels private money will be invested once the project has started. If you own land at or near the Fresno to Bakersfield route then you stand to profit. Buy land and wait, and buy land in the path of development still holds true.

Failed Exchanges – Safe Harbor and Options

We found information regarding 1031 exchanges and tax obligations on an exchange between two calendar years. Typically we have found that the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") will not challenge or disqualify a 1031 Exchange transaction as long as the investor has followed the Safe Harbor provisions or guidelines provided by the Treasury Regulations. What this means is to use a qualified 1031 intermediary who will hold the sales proceeds until a like kind property is located, so the sale proceeds never actually reached your account. If you do a 1031 by yourself and receive the funds from the sold property then you still may have an option on when to account for the taxes.

If an exchange fails, funds are returned to the investor and taxes are owed. But if a failed exchange runs over two different calendar years, investors may have an option on when to pay taxes. Let’s say the sold property closes escrow on December 1, 2011 and as of the 45th day of the exchange, the investor has not found a replacement property so the the exchange is now cancelled. The sale proceeds from the sold property must then be returned to the investor in January 2012 whic is the 46th day of the exchange. The investor has the option to recognize the tax liability either in 2011 or 2012. The investor sold the property in 2011, but they had the right to the benefit in 2012. The investor should contact their accountant for the best option, but this scenario does provide such an option.

First Solar Inc. Teaming Up With NRG Energy on Alpine Solar Project in Lancaster, Ca.

(imagefreephoto.co.uk)
NRG Solar, is building the 66 megawatt (MW) Alpine Solar Project in Lancaster, Ca. and it will be the first large scale project built in LA County, and the largest photovoltaic facility in the State of California. First Solar will handle the construction, operation and maintenance services. The electricity from this project will be bought over a 20 year purchases agreement with PG&E. The expectation is that 250 jobs will be created in the construction phase, and it plans to begin by the end of 2011 and complete by 2012.
According to numerous news sources and press releases this project will be on disturbed land which means mainly previously farmed land. It will also be near a SoCal Edison electric distribution system. Based on the description it looks to be in Antelope Valley’s west side perhaps somewhere near AVSolarRanchOne or Tuusso Energy’s site.
Once we know more about this sites location we will post it here.

The Southern California Water Solution Maybe in the Desert, Which Could Increase the Price of your Investment Land

(imagefunnypictures)
The original article was reported by Noaki Schwartz and Garance Burke of the Associated Press.

In the Mojave Desert east of Needles, Ca. in San Bernardino County is a place called Cadiz, Ca. It seems more like a location for a Clint Eastwood western as it is a desolate dry hot desert, but there maybe an oasis of water here just south of route 66. According to reports this oasis has tall green trees with lemons, and grape vines awaiting harvest.

A private water company indicates beneath the 35,000 acres Cadiz ranch is an aquifer with enough water for 400,000 homes. They indicate that this water comes originally from springs above in the Desert Mountains and settles in Cadiz and eventually resurfaces in dusty lake beds dozens of miles away where it evaporates in the hot desert.
A proposal to tap this water supply was rejected several years ago, but their new plan is to drill thirty four wells, and then pipe the water along the railroad line that currently exits.

Environmentalists say that this will impact the desert tortoise, bighorn sheep, Joshua trees and other plants and animals. Conversationalists say the aquifer is not as large as the company indicates, and even others say removing so much water annually will not allow the aquifer to recharge itself with limited annual rainfall. The debate will continue, but to us if the water is simply evaporating then a balance between man and nature maybe able to be made. Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called the proposal "a path-breaking, new, sustainable groundwater conservation and storage project," when the prior proposal was made years ago.

According to the Associated Press, since 2010, the Santa Margarita Water District, Three Valleys Water District, Golden State Water Company, Suburban Water Systems and Jurupa Community Services District entered into agreements with Cadiz to receive water. These agencies supply water to parts of Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County and eastern San Gabriel Valley.

Now 400,000 homes will only serve a fraction of the water needs of Southern California, but it is enough to serve Lancaster and Palmdale, Ca. or Victorville’s current populations. We will see if the recent proposal will gather enough steam to flow water down to the Antelope Valley and onto farmland and homes instead of evaporating into dry air. Certainly, a future water solution will allow the High Desert areas to grow much like Arizona has.

General Probate Procedure for Real Property in California

An estate of less than $100,000 which doesn’t include real property (real estate) can be done as a mini-probate. According to attorney’s we are familiar with, it simply needs an affidavit of death, and a declaration with a description of the assets.

A Probate proceeding is necessary whenever a decease person has left assets which have not been placed in a trust or a joint tenancy before death. An estate value of less than $100,000 doesn’t have to go through a full probate proceeding. Also if the real estate is under $100,000 there is a special "small estates" procedure that heirs can use under California probate code section 13151. A full probate can take seven months or more and use up capital in legal fees, and court costs. A small probate would take two months and can be done for $1500 to $2500 with most attorneys in California. It can be a little different when assets include real estate.
In Real Estate Probate, If the property is appraised as having a value of less than $20,000 it can be taken by affidavit, which can even be done without an attorney. However, as recommended by attorneys, if the estate is worth less than $100,000 and the real property is worth more than $20,000, you will need to petition the court. If you choose to tackle a probate on your own in order to save the $1500 to $2500 legal and court fees then you may need to get into some reading such as How to Probate an Estate in California by Julia Nissley. It does come recommended via online book stores. Typically asking questions of court clerks will likely get a reply of “I can’t tell you, I am not the Judge”. Also, forget about seeing the judge.
You can likely save yourself anguish and heartache by seeking the advice of an attorney, so you essentially get a third party to handle your family affairs. We do recommend that you handle the probate as soon as possible. If you wait until you get an offer on your property it will takes months to complete the probate and the buyer may move onto other opportunities.

Reverse 1031 Exchange: To Buy Before you Sell

imagebrucewedel

In a standard 1031 Exchange a property is sold and then replacement property is acquired. If you locate a property you want but have not sold a property you currently own then a reverse 1031 could be advantageous. This is not a common in practice but has been done by investors. Some common reasons to do a reverse exchange is you have located a property you want based on price, location, zoning or other reason, but you need to act now in order to buy this property. Not a problem simple purchase this new property and begin the process of a reverse 1031 exchange.

Another reason is that many investors have been caught in the middle by not locating an exchange property in the 45 days to identify and 180 days to close timeframe. Locking up that exchange property in advance solve this dilemma for investors, and it may be easier for you to sell your current property than to locate a replacement property. In a slow real estate market it actually maybe harder to sell your current property and easier to get the replacement, especially, if the replacement property is at a low price and ideal location.

Acquiring replacement property first in a Reverse 1031 Exchange can cause some difficulties though. Since you have not sold your current property then you need the deposit funds for the new property. The biggest obstacle is that the two properties can’t be owned at the same time. In theory, an exchange is going from one property to another, so title to the new property and the old property can not be held at the same time. You will need to get a Reverse Exchange Asset Company to act as a straw buyer for the replacement property. You still must adhere to the 45 and 180 day rule as well.
So in a Reverse Exchange the property that will be sold to complete the exchange must be named by day 45 and it must close escrow on or before day 180.

Locating a reputable 1031 exchange company is the key in this manner, as they will act as the straw buyer. We at vacantlanddeals.com have a number of low priced properties that will be ideal buying opportunities. You can buy one of our industrial or residential low priced properties and sell your agricultural land parcels that you may have bought at the height of the market. It is an ideal time to take advantage of lower price Lancaster and Palmdale land, and we have inventory currently that can fit a reverse 1031 exchange.